Chapter 7 provides a detailed discussion of warehouse health and safety risks. These include risks associated with layout, floors, heating, noise, housekeeping and fire. Review these risks, and in a two- to three-page paper (not including the title and reference pages), present a risk assessment of a warehouse. If you do not have access to a local warehouse, you can use a buyers’ club (i.e., Costco or Sam’s Club) as a substitute. In addition, for each risk identified, present at least one recommendation on how to mitigate that risk.Your paper must be formatted according to APA style as outlined in the approved APA style guide and should cite at least two scholarly sources in addition to the textbook. Description: Total Possible Score: 10.00Present a Risk Assessment of a WarehouseTotal: 4.00Distinguished – Presents a comprehensive risk assessment relevant to warehouse management, and identifies all warehouse health and safety risks.Proficient – Presents a sufficient risk assessment that relates to warehouse management. Minor details of the warehouse health and safety risks are missing.Basic – Presents a vague risk assessment that minimally relates to warehouse management. Relevant details of the warehouse health and safety risks are missing.Below Expectations – The risk assessment is underdeveloped and is missing major details of the warehouse health and safety risks.Non-Performance – The risk assessment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions. Presents at Least One Recommendation for Risk MitigationTotal: 4.00Distinguished – Clearly presents at least one appropriate and feasible recommendation to mitigate each identified risk by describing specific methods, policies, procedures, or changes to be made within the warehouse.Proficient – Presents at least one appropriate recommendation to mitigate each identified risk by describing specific methods, policies, procedures, or changes to be made within the warehouse. Some minor details are missing.Basic – Minimally presents at least one recommendation to mitigate each identified risk. The recommendation is not well-defined and/or is insufficient in describing methods, policies, procedures, or changes to be made within the warehouse.Below Expectations – Attempts to present at least one recommendation to mitigate each identified risk; however, the methods, policies, procedures, or changes to be made within the warehouse are not sufficiently described.Non-Performance – The recommendation of how to mitigate each identified risk is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions. Critical Thinking: Explanation of IssuesTotal: 0.50Distinguished – Clearly and comprehensively explains in detail the issue to be considered, delivering all relevant information necessary for a full understanding.Proficient – Clearly explains in detail the issue to be considered, delivering enough relevant information for an adequate understanding.Basic – Briefly recognizes the issue to be considered, delivering minimal information for a basic understanding.Below Expectations – Briefly recognizes the issue to be considered, but may not deliver additional information necessary for a basic understanding.Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. Creative Thinking: Solving ProblemsTotal: 0.50Distinguished – Develops a logical, consistent plan to solve a problem, identifies consequences of the solution, and can clearly communicate the reason for choosing the solution.Proficient – Carefully chooses among alternatives, and develops a logical, consistent approach to problem solving.Basic – Takes into account and eliminates less acceptable approaches to problem solving.Below Expectations – Takes into account a single approach and uses the approach to problem solving.Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. Written Communication: Control of Syntax and MechanicsTotal: 0.25Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors, and is very easy to understand.Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors, and is mostly easy to understand.Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors, which may slightly distract the reader.Below Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors, which distract the reader.Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. APA FormattingTotal: 0.25Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.Proficient – Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.Basic – Exhibits basic knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements.Below Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. Page RequirementTotal: 0.25Distinguished – The paper meets the specific page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.Proficient – The paper closely meets the page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.Basic – The paper meets over half of the page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.Below Expectations – A fraction of the page requirement is completed.Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. Source RequirementTotal: 0.25Distinguished – Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.Proficient – Uses required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.Basic – Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.Below Expectations – Uses inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.